Identify credible risk
Focus attention on security, correctness, reliability, race-condition, and severe performance issues with reachable impact.
Code review for every change
Code is easier to create. Confidence still has to be earned.
Review changes wherever they are created, resolve findings iteratively, and help individuals and teams ship better software with confidence.
- High-signal findings
- Practical remediation
- Re-review and verification
One platform, two products
Review before and after code enters a repository.
Start with the change in front of you, then carry the same focused workflow into the repositories where teams decide what ships.
Personal Review Available foundation
Review before you share.
Bring focused review to local, staged, and branch changes without waiting for a pull request or requiring a connected repository.
Explore Personal Review feature/auth-hardening
~$git fetch origin main
~$git diff --unified=3 origin/main...HEAD
Enjoyable review Complete
P1 src/auth.ts:42
Assignment bypasses the role check
The assignment evaluates truthy and grants admin access to every authenticated user.
P2 src/cache.ts:118
Failed writes remain marked as cached
2 actionable findings · style noise suppressed
Repository Review Planned
Review every connected change.
Carry the same review standard into connected repositories, pull requests, and organization-sponsored preflight workflows.
Explore Repository Reviewacme/api · Pull request #418
auth: enforce active membership
src/access.ts 41–44
41const membership = await findMembership(user);
42+ return membership?.active ?? true;
43}
P1 Authorization
Missing membership defaults to access
A failed or absent membership lookup evaluates to true, allowing a user without an active organization membership through this check.
Suggested fix: require membership to exist and be explicitly active.
Planned review format Inline finding + check summary
The review loop
Find it. Fix it. Verify it.
A useful review does more than post comments. It helps move a change from a credible finding to a verified resolution.
Resolve findings iteratively
Use actionable explanations and practical fix direction, then submit the revised change for another pass.
Verify the resolution
Re-review what changed and record whether the finding was fixed, dismissed, accepted, or still needs attention.
Code review questions, answered
Code review questions, answered
How Personal Review, Repository Review, availability, and review boundaries work.
Put a focused review loop on your next change.
Start with Personal Review's available diff-review foundation, or talk to us about Repository Review for your workflow.